DC Animated Universe
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
 
<blockquote>''Due to the fact that Red Tornado was seen in action after its apparent destruction by AMAZO, it is likely that it is either one of a series of androids; capable of regeneration similar to [[Brainiac]]; or able to transfer its consciousness to a new body.''</blockquote>
 
<blockquote>''Due to the fact that Red Tornado was seen in action after its apparent destruction by AMAZO, it is likely that it is either one of a series of androids; capable of regeneration similar to [[Brainiac]]; or able to transfer its consciousness to a new body.''</blockquote>
 
This is too much conjecture and speculation. It should be simply said that he was destroyed and rebuilt shortly after. ― '''[[User talk:Thailog|<font color="red">T</font>]][[User:Thailog|<font color="blue">hailog</font>]]''' 19:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 
This is too much conjecture and speculation. It should be simply said that he was destroyed and rebuilt shortly after. ― '''[[User talk:Thailog|<font color="red">T</font>]][[User:Thailog|<font color="blue">hailog</font>]]''' 19:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  +
  +
::Its saying that somehow the character is able to survive near-total destruction without definitively saying how (since we don't know). AMAZO cut him in half, and both halves exploded. Saying he was rebuilt is a greater degree of speculation, since that statement is a definitive explanation of how he survived, which we have no evidence for. All we really know is that he blew up, and by the next episode, he was OK again. Having been rebuilt is covered by the ''"one of a series of androids"'' option. --[[User:BoneGnawer|BoneGnawer]] 19:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:22, 26 February 2007

Conjecture

Due to the fact that Red Tornado was seen in action after its apparent destruction by AMAZO, it is likely that it is either one of a series of androids; capable of regeneration similar to Brainiac; or able to transfer its consciousness to a new body.

This is too much conjecture and speculation. It should be simply said that he was destroyed and rebuilt shortly after. ― Thailog 19:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Its saying that somehow the character is able to survive near-total destruction without definitively saying how (since we don't know). AMAZO cut him in half, and both halves exploded. Saying he was rebuilt is a greater degree of speculation, since that statement is a definitive explanation of how he survived, which we have no evidence for. All we really know is that he blew up, and by the next episode, he was OK again. Having been rebuilt is covered by the "one of a series of androids" option. --BoneGnawer 19:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)